Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Geoff G's avatar

When Donalds is talking about black families and "LBJ's H.E.W." he's indirectly citing Daniel Patrick Moynihan's famous/infamous white paper, written for the LBJ admin. on "The Negro Family." He's also mangling it. It's true that Moynihan attributed Black poverty to unstable/female headed families - that accounts for its fame and its infamy. But everything else in the paper contradicts Donalds' thesis.

First, HEW was formed in 1953 - the Eisenhower administration - not during LBJ's. Second, Donalds is obliquely referring to the "Welfare" part of HEW, meaning Aid to Families with Dependent Children, which was established in 1935. (The date of its establishment is a clue as to who the primary beneficiaries of AFDC were; White folks, who've always outnumbered Blacks on the "welfare" rolls.) Moynihan does not say "welfare" is a cause of unstable Black families. In Part III of the paper, titled "The Roots of the Problem" the root is

Slavery. (I set this apart just the way Moynihan's paper did, a one word "paragraph" under the chapter heading.)

The first full paragraph states: "The most perplexing question abut American slavery, which has never been altogether explained, and which indeed most Americans hardly know exists, has been stated by Nathan Glazer as follows: 'Why was American slavery the most awful the world has ever known?' The only thing that can be said with certainty is that this is true: it was.'" Moynihan goes on to show a lot of reasons American slavery was the worst that ever existed - much worse, for example, than Brazilian slavery.

Of course, one of the main horrors of enslavement was that the children of enslaved people were also enslaved. Another horror is that Black families were routinely broken up when enslaved spouses and children were sold to different slave-drivers. This, and the astounding lack of human dignity accorded to the enslaved (astounding even compared to slavery in other countries, like Brazil) - an indignity compounded by almost 100 years of segregation - is basically why Moynihan said Black families were unstable.

Today, this is part of what we mean by "systemic racism." For centuries Blacks have lacked the ability to acquire generational wealth, and generate the social capital that Whites can. There's more to systemic racism than this, but to me, anyway, this is the undeniable core of Black inequality today, also known as "the lingering effects of slavery and segregation."

Finally, I note that Moynihan's paper came out in 1965, when LBJ had been president for just over a year, and before any of his Great Society programs, so Moynihan was clearly not blaming LBJ, or even Democratic policies in general, for Black poverty.

Sorry this is so long, but though I'm a White guy, I've been thinking about this longer than Donalds has been alive. (I can even recite conservative claptrap better than Donalds, an unfortunate by-product of caring about the issue.)

Expand full comment
Brando's avatar

Isn't Donalds himself a convicted felon (with an expunged record)? Is the GOP really going to wind up with two felons on the ticket?

I guess Donalds is saying that our welfare policies have disincentives for keeping families intact--e.g., a higher payout if there are two earning spouses in the household compared to a single parent--so I guess we should all eagerly anticipate the slate of welfare reforms he is proposing to ensure that families on welfare can still receive adequate assistance without any disincentives towards keeping two spouses in the household. I'm not holding my breath, though....

And it might surprise Donalds to know but most black Americans are not on welfare, and are definitely better off than they were under Jim Crow, and that the end of Jim Crow and the creation of laws that opened up a lot of jobs to black people that they couldn't get before is due to liberals passing such laws, that were opposed by conservative heroes like Reagan and Goldwater (while Nixon was no prize on racial issues as POTUS, he did at least support the civil rights act, unlike his parties dipshit nominee in '64). But I guess Donalds cannot credit liberals for anything, so he has to engage in this absurd fiction that black families were better off in Jim Crow times. You know, when they weren't caught in sundown towns, or accidentally made eye contact with a white person on the sidewalk, or forgot their place and sat in the wrong part of the bus even after coming home from fighting for this country in WWII.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts