Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brando's avatar

The Katie Hill story pisses me off. The correct response needed to be "fuck this ethics shit" and let the story die when the next shiny object comes along. Especially during the Trump era, this proved to be the best way through any scandal, especially one the voters don't give a crap about (name me one Katie Hill voter in her district who would have said "oh, wait she was unethical, eek, I won't vote for her now" and I'll sell you the extended warranty and undercoating). Instead, she resigned, losing that seat for good (it is still in GOP hands!).

Democrats have to learn to stop playing by chump rules.

Expand full comment
Brando's avatar

I've asked people why Senate Democrats do not immediately hold hearings on these nominees at least to get negative news out about them before the GOP Senate gavels in, and I've been told--incorrectly--that no hearings can be held until Trump actually takes office and makes his nominations "official". (For the record--president-elects often nominate, and the Senate often approves, nominees before even taking office, so they have much of their Cabinet in place by inauguration day).

But why hold hearings or focus a coordinated media strategy on these guys, and why leak an ethics report, when we can just as easily sit back and silent and assume the media and "principled" Republicans will do the work for you?

It's bad enough that the American voters decided Trump is just fine and nothing matters. But it's even worse that the opposition party has decided a policy of "getting out of the way" is somehow going to pay off in some future election, as if that ever happened.

Expand full comment
50 more comments...

No posts