Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Late Blooming's avatar

I completely agree, and saying so has put me at odds with many of my fellow left leaners on this issue. "Elect more women!" is essentially a meaningless statement, as is a comment that any race that includes a straight white man (especially one in the lead) is evidence of the patriarchy at work. Nor do I believe members of a dominant group are obligated to apologize for or police the actions of their most extreme members. We are individuals! Not monoliths! Like Stephen, I believe diversity itself is an admirable goal, but I also *strongly* believe it is secondary to policy concerns and my voting record makes that clear. Clearly, diversity *in and of itself* will not address the issues of the day important to our side (hello, Clarence Thomas), but electing people whose worldviews and views on justice across the board might.

No posts

Ready for more?