Ex-Prince Andrew, The Bus-Driving Sex Offender, Has A Lot In Common With His Creepy Uncle
Some fun history
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who once held the absurd titles “prince” and “Duke of York,” was arrested last week on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to his links to Jeffrey Epstein, the (fortunately) deceased pedophile who had friends exclusively in high places.
British police questioned Mountbatten-Windsor for hours about reports that claim the disgraced former royal sent “confidential information” to Epstein in 2010, when Mountbatten-Windsor was Britain’s special envoy for international trade — a position he was probably never actually qualified to hold. The prince-no-more reportedly directly emailed Epstein information about investment opportunities in Afghanistan. You’re not supposed to share government secrets with random Americans, especially those with their own nightmare version of Pinocchio’s Pleasure Island. He should’ve paid more attention during orientation.
We knew Mountbatten-Windsor was a slimy pervert but now we know he’s possibly a traitor. This really isn’t that surprising, as there’s really no such thing as the “gentleman pervert.” Another example of a treasonous scumbag who’s also guilty of sexual misconduct is the current U.S. president, still at large and an ongoing threat.
When asked about his fellow Epstein classmate, Trump told reporters, “I think it’s a shame. I think it’s very sad. I think it’s so bad for the royal family. It’s very, very sad. To me, it’s a very sad thing.”
Trump expressed more grief for Mountbatten-Windsor’s richly deserved fate than he has for Jeffrey Epstein’s victims or the American citizens his ICE agents murdered in the street.
The charges against Mountbatten-Windsor are serious enough that if convicted, he could face life imprisonment. His brother is the reigning monarch, but he shouldn’t expect a pardon. King Charles is pretty much done with him. Charles has already stripped his brother of his titles and had his coat of arms removed from Windsor Castle — a move normally reserved for traitors.
King Charles released this statement about his brother’s arrest on Thursday, which was also his birthday. The message should’ve appeared on a card for double duty.
I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office. What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities.
In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation. Let me state clearly: the law must take its course. As this process continues, it would not be right for me to comment further on this matter. Meanwhile, my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all.
King Charles doesn’t even refer to Mountbatten-Windsor as his brother. It’s like he’s no longer a member of the Royal Family, just Andrew, the bus-driving sex offender. However, that’s still not enough in the U.K., where they apparently take this level of corruption seriously.
Piers Morgan posted on social media: “How can Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor STILL be 8th in line to the throne? Absolutely ridiculous. King Charles must remove him from the line of succession asap.”
Eighth in line to the throne is meaningless unless there’s some unlikely King Ralph scenario. Besides, it’s not as if William and Harry are ever in the same room these days. The non-criminal royal blood lines are secure. (Mountbatten-Windsor was fourth in line until William and Harry started having kids, and that was during the sordid peak of his relationship with Epstein.)
Queen Elizabeth was more forgiving of her terrible son. The most she ever did was cancel his 60th birthday party after he bombed a BBC interview about his relationship with Epstein. Although “cancel” is probably too strong a term, as she reportedly hosted a small family dinner instead of a lavish celebration. I’m not in the Epstein files and I’d still consider myself lucky to have a small family dinner on my 60th. Don’t make me go to some big party.
A royal source claimed that King Charles and Prince William wanted to exorcise Mountbatten-Windsor from the family for years but the Queen wouldn’t have it.
“The Queen was always protecting him at all costs, and it was known that he was her favorite child,” the source dished. “She knew about everything — Epstein, the girls, the trafficking — and I believe she was just trying to help him. She just turned a blind eye to it.”
Other sources claim that Edward, the Queen’s youngest child, was her favorite. Edward is dull but reportedly not a pedophile. Still, Anne is neither.
The disgraced Mountbatten-Windsor has a lot in common with his not-so great uncle, the former King Edward and later Duke of Windsor. He abdicated the throne in 1936 so he could marry American socialite Wallis Simpson. It wasn’t like she was Black or anything, but she was a divorcee with two living ex-husbands. It’s a great premise for a sitcom but the Church of England didn’t see the humor.
However, the abdication proved in the best interests of Britain and perhaps the free world. Edward was very friendly with Nazis, including the monstrous Adolf Hitler.
The Duke and Duchess of Windsor visited Nazi Germany in 1937, against the British government’s advice. Hitler was a known despot at this point who was actively oppressing German Jews, but nonetheless, Edward went full Fetterman with Hitler (OK, that’s probably a little unfair — to the Duke of Windsor, who was a famously sharp dresser.) Hitler and his cronies knew their marks and greeted the Windsors with the British national anthem and a chorus of Nazi salutes. Hitler went out of his way to treat the scorned Duchess of Windsor like the queen she could never be.
The Windsors enjoyed a hell’s dinner party with Joseph Goebbels, Hermann Göring, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Albert Speer. They took tea with Adolf Hitler in Berchtesgaden. The Duke and Hitler had a lengthy private conservation that has been lost to history, but how long do you think Hitler could go without talking about hating Jews? Your MAGA relatives can’t keep their bigotry in check for an entire holiday meal. Meanwhile, the Duchess had afternoon tea with Hitler’s deputy, Rudolf Hess, who was also evil.
After their visit, the two useful idiots sent Hitler a thank-you note, written in German: “To the Führer and [Chancellor], the Duchess of Windsor and I would like to thank you sincerely. Our trip through Germany has made a great impression on us. Many thanks to you for the wonderful time that we had with you at the Obersalzberg.” (This is obviously the English translation. German is quite different.)
Once the Nazis started the second World War in 1939, historians allege that the Duke of Windsor collaborated with Hitler’s government for his own aggrandizement and out of petty spite.
In the documentary Edward VIII: Britain's Traitor King, Anna Pasternak, author of The American Duchess: The Real Wallis Simpson, said, “Edward’s motivation was a sense of rejection from England. I think he never really got over that.”
“Here is a former king that was exiled from Britain,” Pasternak continued. “There was so much hurt, rage, misunderstanding. That went into a lot of why and how he behaved. He was utterly selfish. As a lot of the documents might suggest, the Duke was terrifyingly open to Germany and what he felt the Germans could offer him.”
In May 1939, the Duke recorded a message to the British public from his office in France, urging his former subjects to “come to terms with Nazi Germany.” The BBC refused to air his appeasement drivel and buried the tape in its archives with the note: “IMPORTANT: Not to be broadcast.”
The infamous Marburg files detail a proposed Nazi plot to restore the Duke of Windsor to the throne he’d abandoned but with his wife by his side as queen. This could only happen if Britain fell, and there’s reason to believe the Duke supported that outcome in the guise of “peace.” The Marburg files include this shocking message from the German ambassador in Lisbon to Berlin.
[The Duke of Windsor] is convinced that if he had remained on the throne, war would have been avoided, and he characterizes himself as a firm supporter of a peaceful arrangement with Germany. The Duke definitely believes that continued severe bombing would make England ready for peace.
The Duke’s Nazi sympathies weren’t new. In July 1933, while still the Prince of Wales, he told former Kaiser Wilhelm II’s grandson, Prince Louis Ferdinand, that it was “no business of ours to interfere in Germany’s internal affairs either re Jews or re anything else.”
“Dictators are very popular these days,” Edward added. “We might want one in England before long.”
I never thought I’d ever feel grateful for the Church of England
The Crown depicts the revelations in the Marburg files as the final straw for Queen Elizabeth (Claire Foy), who permanently banishes her uncle from the homeland he’d betrayed. “There is no possibility of my forgiving you,” she says. “The question is: How on earth can you forgive yourself?” (Watch below.)
We don’t know if the Queen actually ever read her uncle for filth in private. Publicly, Buckingham Palace defended the disgraced former king with a statement steeped in plausible deniability:
The Duke was subjected to heavy pressure from many quarters to stay in Europe, where the Germans hoped that he would exert influence against the policy of His Majesty’s government.
His Royal Highness never wavered in his loyalty to the British cause … The German records are necessarily a much tainted source. The only firm evidence which they provide is of what the Germans were trying to do in the matter, and of how completely they failed to do it.
Hitler’s plan to use the Duke as a witless tool against Britain is eerily reminiscent of how Vladimir Putin plays on Trump’s vanity and ego-driven stupidity — although he ultimately had more success. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is perhaps equally compromised, but it seems he might meet a harsher justice than his great-uncle’s comfortable “exile” in France.
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor-the royal formerly known as Prince Andrew-and Donald Trump are what you get when someone has all the resources and advantages in the world but absolutely no sense of duty or purpose instilled in them. It corroded both their souls. If they hadn't caused so much damage and pain-in Trump's case, continues to-I would feel sorry for them. As it is, they're just loathsomely pathetic, barely human.
Well that's some disturbing history for a chaser of the disturbing present.