Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SethTriggs's avatar

Meh, while I am fine with Talarico, it hasn't been lost on me that people online keep yelling at Democrats, "Fight, fight," "Meet the moment" and then the voters are like, "no," in non-safe districts. Online they're like "We want pit fighters yeah! And they need to say the Pretty Words What Democrats Like too!"

And it really is only Dems that have to have gravitas. Good ol' Murc's Law! There is no way the numerous out-and-out cranks and neer-do-wells in the Republican Party even approach that...especially when you consider the 88-ring circus that is Maladministration 2.0.

For example, Coach Shouty is leading a committee. The man doesn't do a single thing for his district. It's all a bunch of people there to gum up the works so their unreconstructed state-based regimes of terror can wild out.

But hey we'll see if Talarico has got it this fall as long as people make sure they're ready to do the thing.

Linda1961 is woke and proud's avatar

I like Crockett and think that she would have made a great senator, but you make a great point about being a firebrand to go viral versus having gravitas to govern well. Being an internet sensation doesn't mean that someone won't be serious about governing, but there should be substance to back it up. AOC has gotten in some zingers, but they are more pointed and specific to the person and/or situation. Crockett has voted the right way on issues, which is why she would have been a good senator. Her zingers don't turn me off, but I can see why they would turn off others, who actually agree with her on most issues.

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?